Difference between revisions of "2015 May MIT"

From Digital Response
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Line 82: Line 82:
 
* '''[[Template/questionaire for After Action report]] to be made ''during'' deployment''':  
 
* '''[[Template/questionaire for After Action report]] to be made ''during'' deployment''':  
 
* '''[[Who What Where for virtual and coordinating responders]]''':  
 
* '''[[Who What Where for virtual and coordinating responders]]''':  
 +
* Resilience with respect to fragile infrastructure
 +
* Application / promotion of consent frameworks
 +
Accountability mechanisms between frontline communities and responders -- do they exist? Should we make them?
 +
* External NGOs 'helping' and then leaving without leaving ongoing support is disruptive
 +
* Citizen-centric data model
 +
  
 
[[Category: MIT]] [[Category: Events]]
 
[[Category: MIT]] [[Category: Events]]

Revision as of 17:52, 18 May 2015

Date: May 9+10

Location: MIT Media Lab in Cambridge, MA

Registration Link: http://humtechinteract.eventbrite.com

Universe of Topics

Data Collection

  • What's the good, bad, and ugly of data collection
  • how do we handle privacy/security in high-vulnerability times?
  • Data from community should be usable by the community
  • How to make it easier for different tech to work together

Adoption

  • How technology can improve coordination after a disaster
  • how to get people excited about tech for manageing data
  • how do we share canvasing data and keep it secure?
  • how do we bake consent culture into disaster and humanitarian efforts?

Local/External

  • How can communities hold responders/NGOs/etc accountable?
  • When is a good time to leave the disaster area as a humanitarian?
  • How to better support local info responders? (eg Kathmandu Living Lab)?
  • scale systems while keeping them personal
  • How might we learn from local populations in a state of emergency

Resilience

  • How to make info resilience (lists of NGOs, shelters, existing communities) normal everywhere?
  • How can we be proactive about disasters rather than reactive
  • Lessons learned from response to Ebola Crisis in West Africa
  • Best methods to teach people
  • how to encourage people to get training before a disaster instead of volunteering after a disaster
  • Breaking down resilience and how that term is carried out
  • How to keep attention for long-term needs
  • Looking at topics through the lends of urban planning and city infrastructure

Local capacity and volunteers

  • For-profit social good vs nonprofit/humanitarian
  • how formal and informal groups can work together
  • Is it possible to support frontline communities without being disruptive?
  • ways to teach/trigger curiosity
  • Better/more efficient tech for first responders (EMT/Police/Fire)

Bandwidth

  • How to improve connecti ity after a disaster
  • How do we get info to affected people in low bandwidth environments (eg SMS)?

Security

  • How to hack-proof wireless tech
  • Systematic support for targets of cyberstalking?
  • how to reduce cost of forensic analysis of hacked IT equipment

Visualization

  • Best way to display information and data
  • What is the role of simulation and tech like Oculus Rift?
  • What is the user journey of an emergency (1 day, 1 week, 1 month in)

Spectrogram

  • Philanthropy isn't sustainable
  • We have all the tech. We need to solve the problems at hand
  • Private companies should be responsible for assisting in emergencies
  • We already have enough tech solutions
  • People are not comfortable enough with technology to use it in stressful/emergency situations

Discussion Topics/Breakouts

Projects

Things to Peruse Further

Accountability mechanisms between frontline communities and responders -- do they exist? Should we make them?

  • External NGOs 'helping' and then leaving without leaving ongoing support is disruptive
  • Citizen-centric data model